The Bitcoin White Paper: Part One

Submitted by Aaron Goldstein on

Written by :

Aaron Goldstein

Published on :

The Bitcoin White Paper: Part One

Who better to discuss the nuances and mapping of Bitcoin with than the creator himself, Dr. Craig S. Wright. That’s exactly what Ryan X. Charles was able to do in an interview discussing the Bitcoin white paper, line by line. It was an opportunity to share with the world in an open discussion Dr. Wright’s creation and vision. Let’s take a look at some of the takeaways from that interview. 

Bitcoin was created as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Understanding that Bitcoin can be tokenized and built upon, however that distinction is secondary to its main purpose. Its primary purpose is an electronic cash system whose benefits include all transactions being auditable and traceable. It in turn becomes a self-custodian of Bitcoin.  

For example, in central banks, Bitcoin could be used as an audit log providing complete transparency. 

While the Bitcoin network itself is made up of users, nodes, merchants and exchanges, the only true peer-to-peer component are the nodes. Users themselves are considered person-to-person.  

Bitcoin-SV-Application-Layers-040221.png

One important distinction in the makeup of the system is that there are fiduciaries such as protocol developers and miners but no trusted third parties between the two people transacting together. That’s a key to the security and robustness of Bitcoin. Third parties are able to be compromised at some level including those breaches that could become catastrophic to both users and businesses alike. The difference is that if a node disappears for any reason, it has no real effect on the system.   

The network itself is for the most part simplistic in form. Small nodes attach themselves to larger nodes creating an incentivized work structure. This peer-to-peer network prevents double spending of coins. Records cannot be changed because the block header would have to change. That would require changing the proof of work. Because nodes are incentivized for honest work, a malicious or intentional attack on a block would be outpaced by the rest of the nodes in the network performing honest work. 

The system is automated in a manner that provides for a node to reconnect if for any reason they had to disconnect. In doing so, the node simply accepts the longest chain as proof of work. This will suffice to get them back up and running with the information they missed while they were offline. Their being offline also has no effect on the rest of the network. 

While we have only scratched the surface, it really isn’t as complex as it may seem. To quote Dr. Wright referring to the complexity of the network “it just happens”.

Related Content

More Staff Being Let Go From VSiN: Josh Appelbaum the Latest

More Staff Being Let Go From VSiN: Josh Appelbaum the Latest

Applebaum was the host of the All Systems Go Podcast. He announced Tuesday that VSiN had let him go.
VSiN The Baseball Betting Show Host and Basketball Pundit Greg Peterson Contract Won't Be Renewed

VSiN The Baseball Betting Show Host and Basketball Pundit Greg Peterson Contract Won't Be Renewed

Other network personalities announce in recent days they will no longer be with VSiN.
Trending Prediction Markets: Fed Decision in September Hike 25bps 85 Percent Chance

Trending Prediction Markets: Fed Decision in September Hike 25bps 85 Percent Chance

The FOMC will meet for its September session after holding the target range at 3.50% to 3.75% in July, according to CNBC. The prediction markets have an 80% chance of an increase.
Pennsylvania Gambler Sues FanDuel: Says He Was Bombarded With Late Night Alerts After Losses

Pennsylvania Gambler Sues FanDuel: Says He Was Bombarded With Late Night Alerts After Losses

Maurice Faulk filed his civil suit accusing FanDuel of using data-driven promotions and repeated prompts to keep him betting at times he says he was least able to resist.