You are here: Home / Web Filters in Australia Will Embarrass Government

Web Filters in Australia Will Embarrass Government

Australia Web Filtering

An Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) chief has said the Australian government will "embarrass itself" if it pushes ahead with plans to install a national Internet content filter, according to a report filed by Darren Pauli of Sex Party.org.

ICANN board chair Peter Dengate Thrush said national Internet content filters are ineffective at law enforcement.

"The government has set itself up for embarrassment," Thrush said.

"I have no problems with the principle behind it [but] censoring material outside the country is difficult and the tools to do it cost a lot."

Behind Australian web filtering is one Communications Minister Stephen Conroy (pictured).

In his effort to block a few porn sites he also managed the filter out a dentist's website and a few online poker rooms.

On 19 March 2009 it was reported that ACMA's blacklist of banned sites had been leaked online, and had been published by Wikileaks.  Conroy described the leak and publication of the blacklist as "grossly irresponsible" and that it undermined efforts to improve "cyber safety". He said that ACMA was investigating the incident and considering a range of possible actions including referral to the Australian Federal Police, and that Australians involved in making the content available would be at "serious risk of criminal prosecution".

Wikileaks replied that they will refer any matter to discover their sources to the Swedish Constitutional Police (under whose jurisdiction Wikileaks is published) and pursue extradition charges if it is found such persons have breached their sources' fundamental rights to anonymity.

"The internet censorship issues is about to ramp up in Australia again," said Media Man Greg Tingle.  It's ok to look, but no touching. ... As for online gambling and online porn, I'm an adult and if I want to gamble on the web or look at porn, and no one gets hurt, I should be allowed to, despite what political party is in power, and what's their religious or otherwise beliefs may be."

Alistair Prescott, Gambling911.com

 

Gambling News

  • Las Vegas sports books didn't score a monumental victory in the New Orleans Saints' 31-17 victory against the Indianapolis Colts in Super Bowl XLIV Sunday.
  • China Online Gambling
    China plans to crack down on the online gaming and gambling industry, including the banks, financial institutions and websites that support it, the Ministry of Public Security advised in a statement posted on its (official) website.
  • The 50th state, Hawaii, may be legalizing poker on the Pacific island, but only for visitors. Hawaii is following the lead of a handful of other US states looking to legalize poker or sports betting or both as a means of boosting their local economies.
  • New Jersey Sports Betting
    A bill to legalize online sports betting in the state of New Jersey passed committee vote on Monday and is now going to be debated in the NJ Senate. A date for the debate is to still be determined.
  • Legislation that would allow New Jersey's horse racing tracks and Atlantic City casinos to accept wagers on sporting events will go before an Assembly panel this week.
  • Super Bowl
    Based on preliminary numbers, the online gambling sites should have been way up over last year’s Super Bowl numbers.
  • Super Bowl 2010
    So far, Sportsbook.com appears to have defied the Super Bowl 2010 betting trends with most of its customers jumping on the Indianapolis Colts bandwagon. 64 percent of gamblers betting the Super Bowl 2010 spread were on Indianapolis at -5 at Sportsbook.com.

User login