DraftKing Proposed Surcharge for Gamblers Proving to be an Epic Fail Already

Submitted by Guest on

Written by :

Guest

Published on :

It's not even implemented but DraftKings notice to investors that it intends to impose a surcharge on gamblers in states where they are required to pay a 20% or higher tax has gone over like a fart in church.

These states include: Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania and Vermont.

Some customers won't realize it.  Others will.

001xbaseball_300x250acq.gif

DraftKings insists the surcharge will be nominal, as much as a mid single digit percentage.  So let's use 5% as an example. 

If someone in one of these four states happens to win $5000, not only will they likely end up having their limits cut, they'll be out $250.  This is before they have to pay taxes on these winnings.  Draftkings reports them to the IRS.

Sam McQuillan of Legal Sports Report provides an example using a smaller payout of $20 that was presented by DraftKings to its investors.

DraftKings, for now at least, appears to be the only gambling company opting for the surcharge. Caesars has already confirmed they will not be doing so.

Responses to the graphic ranged from "F*** that!" to "What the FUCK is this?!?"

Polymarket even chimed in: "Bookies are making winning illegal".

Grantman added: "Absolutely appalling, gray market sites making more and more sense."

Chris Skiria tweeted: "Then DK will lose my business. Yeah, NYS has a 51% tax rate but they make it up in sheer volume."

Shale tweeted: "Bad enough one losses a bet.   Now if you win a bet, you still lose. Where is the rebate for your losses?!?"

Consider this:  Do you tip an extra 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% when you dine out? Imagine a restaurant tacking on that added 5% to your bill after you've tipped the server.

And don't think for a second DraftKings will only apply this to states with the 20% or higher tax rate.  If they can get away with it, they'll implement in all states.  Once the competition sees this, they'll do the same.  Just look at what happened with the airline industry and those temporary checked baggage fees.

nagesh-rath_1.png

Related Content

Need to Find a New Bookie Software Solution

Need to Find a New Bookie Software Solution

If you are frustrated with your bookmaking software solution, it's easy to make the switch to a more state-of-the-art Pay Per Head platform.
Dolphins Winning Outright Against the 49ers Pays Over $1000 on the Moneyline

Dolphins Winning Outright Against the 49ers Pays Over $1000 on the Moneyline

If you're us or Curtis from AcePerHead.com or the 5% of those brave enough to be the Dolphins, even on the spread (+13.5), we hark back to last week's win by the Arizona Cardinals over the LA Chargers for that small glimmer of hope.
LSU vs. Ole MIss PPH Betting Markets September 19

LSU vs. Ole MIss PPH Betting Markets September 19

The more prominent Pay Per Head (PPH) platforms, like AcePerHead.com, feature a wide assortment of traditional game and player prop bets for this one while a handful of sportsbooks will also be offering Lane Kiffin-themed prop bets (will he cry?).
Are There Pay Per Head Platforms That Offer College Player Props in States Where These Are Hard to Access?

Are There Pay Per Head Platforms That Offer College Player Props in States Where These Are Hard to Access?

The AcePerHead.com college player prop builder allows customers to create custom player prop parlays, mixing and matching individual player performance bets across multiple games.