DraftKings Responds to Crazy Lawsuit Alleging Extortion, Leaked Customer Info, Death Threats

Submitted by Jagajeet Chiba on

Written by :

Jagajeet Chiba

Published on :

DraftKings has responded to a lawsuit claiming everything from death threats to extortion to hacking.

ppp-banner-gn-520x340.gif

The complaint, filed in in Supreme Court, Queens County, claims a popular pro sports bettor, Gadoon “Spanky” Kyrollos, was provided DraftKings leaked customer data.  Then it really goes off the rails.

The complainant, only identified as “John Doe”, says that on 30 March 2023 in Long Island City, New York City, a masked man grabbed and violently spunhim around, then threatened to kill the plaintiff unless he paid $500,000 to Spanky. 

The filing alleged that unidentified staff in the “upper echelons” of DraftKings knowingly provided the plaintiff’s address, sensitive personal information, financial history, and betting history to Spanky.

It also alleged that the same DraftKings employees later conspired to change the email address associated with the plaintiff’s sports betting account.

Next.io first broke the story and Jessica Wellman posted to her Twitter page below..

Wellman received comment from DraftKings Tuesday afternoon.  The company says it intends to file a Motion to Dismiss.

When asked for comment, DraftKings provided SBC Americas the following statement:

“The complaint filed against DraftKings in March 2024 by an unnamed plaintiff is full of inaccuracies and baseless allegations. In the complaint, the plaintiff does not identify any DraftKings employee, but rather alleges on ‘information and belief’ that an unknown and unidentified DraftKings employee provided private account information to ‘Spanky’ and to additional unnamed third parties. DraftKings has found no evidence of anyone at DraftKings providing plaintiff’s information to a third-party, and DraftKings denies acknowledging any such ‘security breach’. Nor has DraftKings uncovered any improper activity by a DraftKings employee, or any activity on plaintiff’s account, relating to the allegedly unauthorized change of the email address associated with plaintiff’s DraftKings account. DraftKings is moving to dismiss the complaint by June 28.”

Gambling911.com has reached out to Spanky for comment but have not yet received a response.

jagajeet_1.png

Related Content

LSU vs. Ole MIss PPH Betting Markets September 19

LSU vs. Ole MIss PPH Betting Markets September 19

The more prominent Pay Per Head (PPH) platforms, like AcePerHead.com, feature a wide assortment of traditional game and player prop bets for this one while a handful of sportsbooks will also be offering Lane Kiffin-themed prop bets (will he cry?).
Are There Pay Per Head Platforms That Offer College Player Props in States Where These Are Hard to Access?

Are There Pay Per Head Platforms That Offer College Player Props in States Where These Are Hard to Access?

The AcePerHead.com college player prop builder allows customers to create custom player prop parlays, mixing and matching individual player performance bets across multiple games.
How Easy is it to Switch My Pay Per Head Customers to Another Platform This Football Season?

How Easy is it to Switch My Pay Per Head Customers to Another Platform This Football Season?

AcePerHead is now the largest of the Pay Per Head betting solutions. They claim switching to the AcePerHead.com PPH platform takes under an hour for most small to medium sized sportsbook operations and slightly longer for larger organizations.
Switching From One Pay Per Head to Another: How Easy is the Transition?

Switching From One Pay Per Head to Another: How Easy is the Transition?

The first week of the 2026 NFL season was a rough one for bookies and agents. We hear you.