William Hill Honors Frank Lampard ‘Goal’

Submitted by Alistair Prescott on

Written by :

Alistair Prescott

Published on :

Great Britain's second largest bookmaker, William Hill, is paying out to their customers who bet on Frank Lampard scoring against Germany after his goal was ruled out by the linesman and referee. The bookies estimate the payout will cost them a six figure sum.

Lampard put a shot in the net late in the first half that would have tied the score.  Most everyone, including the German coach (albeit after the game was over), believed Lampard's shot should have been counted as a goal.

Referee Jorge Larrionda saw otherwise and Germany used two second-half goals by Thomas Mueller for a 4-1 victory Sunday.

In light of the controversy over "bad" decisions by refs, William Hill has also released odds on whether video technology will be introduced at the next World Cup.  FIFA insists there is no place in the game for such technology including instant replay.

Alistair Prescott, Gambling911.com         

Related Content

Polymarket

Wanna Bet? Washington Steps Up Scrutiny of Prediction Markets

As the United States was preparing a daring mission to rescue an airman whose fighter jet was shot down by Iran, there was money to be made.
Legal

Ninth Circuit of Appeals Judges Skeptical Over Prediction Markets Claim They Can Bypass State Laws

U.S. Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson bluntly rejected Crypto.com attorney Shay Dvoretzky’s argument that exchange-traded contracts differ in substance from sportsbook wagers.
Guitar Hotel Hollywood Florida

May 2026 Casino Promotions and Events at Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Hollywood

Gambling911.com has received the May 2026 promos and entertainment schedule for the fabulous Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Hollywood, Florida, our own backyard.
Dave & Busters

Suit Against Dave & Busters in South Carolina Court Claims Arcade Games Are Unlawful Gambling

A state advocacy group filed a suit in the District Court of South Carolina Florence Division late Wednesday April 15 arguing the chain’s games function as unlawful gambling rather than entertainment.