Horse Racing Group Closer to Payday in Sports Gambling Suit

Submitted by Associated Press on

Written by :

Associated Press

Published on :

Horse Racing Group Closer to Payday in Sports Gambling Suit

NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up a dispute over whether the major pro sports leagues and the NCAA have to pay millions of dollars to a New Jersey horse racing association over sports betting litigation. 


*6 weeks free trial - test drive - best in the biz
*Deposit with Bitcoin - They'll double it!
*Get your own domain, customized website, logo
*Switch in under an hour, earn mrore $$ for doing so
*Odds featured on DonBest.com
*Thousands of betting options daily + live in-play
*Easy and discreet payment options include gift cards
*Walmart gift cards also accepted
Start Earning Money From Your Sheet Here

The case now goes back to federal court in New Jersey, where a judge will consider evidence from both sides and decide how much the leagues have to pay. 

The leagues had appealed a ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that held in favor of the New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association. The association sued the leagues in 2018 after the Supreme Court overturned a federal ban on sports betting. 

The suit alleged the leagues owe a $3.4 million bond, plus interest, that the leagues put up in 2014 to secure losses that might be suffered during the month that a judge’s restraining order blocked Monmouth Park Racetrack from offering sports betting. 

The horsemen's suit alleged the leagues acted in bad faith in seeking the order, because the leagues were opposing legalized sports betting at the same time they were promoting and endorsing businesses that made millions from fantasy sports games that rely on individual player performances. 

It also claimed the racetrack was wrongfully prevented from offering sports betting at the time because the judge's order was based on a federal ban later determined to be unconstitutional. 

“A party is wrongfully enjoined when it turns out that that party had a right all along to do what it was enjoined from doing,” the 3rd Circuit wrote last year. 

When the case returns to New Jersey, the judge also will determine whether the horsemen’s association's claims of damages as high as $150 million for lost sports betting revenue between Oct. 2014 and the Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling can go forward. 

An email message was left Monday with an attorney representing the leagues in the lawsuit. 

Related Content

Live Gambling News, Top Trending: Updates 24/7 - Thursday June 18 2026

Live Gambling News, Top Trending: Updates 24/7 - Thursday June 18 2026

World Cup - Czech Republic vs. South Africa - Switzerland vs. Bosnia - Giants-Braves Weather - Brendan Sorsby - Cincinnati Football - Saratoga Casino Barn Fire
These Bad Moms Banned for Life at Pennsylvania Casinos: Bad Dad Too

These Bad Moms Banned for Life at Pennsylvania Casinos: Bad Dad Too

Of the 18 banned individuals, four were accused of leaving children unattended in vehicles while they gambled inside.
Vozinha

No Goalscorer Prop Bet - Uraguay vs. Cape Verde: Follows Vozinha Spectacular Performance vs. Spain

Cape Verde 40-year-old goalkeeper and new Instagram sensation Vozinha recorded seven saves Monday, holding Spain’s star-studded lineup to a 0-0 draw that probably felt more like a 3-0 win for the tiny island nation that was making its first World Cup appearance ever.
The Technology Behind Online Live Blackjack Australia and Modern Casino Innovation

The Technology Behind Online Live Blackjack Australia and Modern Casino Innovation

When you sit down at a virtual blackjack table, you expect more than just a video feed. You want the shuffle of real cards, the chatter of a genuine dealer, and the thrill of a land-based casino without leaving your home.