..

Sports Betting Update: NJ vote result submitted to court; DOJ objects

Written by:
Payton
Published on:
Jan/19/2011
mean judge
After attorneys representing iMEGA, Senate President Stephen M. Sweeney and Senator Raymond J. Lesniak submitted the results of the recent sports betting vote in the New Jersey legislature, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) immediately asked a US district court judge to reject those results, insisting they were irrelevant to a suit seeking the overturn of a two-decade national ban on expanded state-regulated wagering.

This past December, lawmakers in both houses of the New Jersey legislature voted overwhelmingly to approve a bill that will put the question of whether the state should legalize and regulate sports betting on the ballot during this year’s statewide elections. The legislative vote carried by a  36-to-3 margin in the Senate, and by a 55-to-17 margin in the Assembly.

The attorneys representing iMEGA and the two senators seek to include this result in the record being considered as part of their lawsuit (iMEGA, et al, v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., et al) to have the court overturn a 20-year-old Federal law prohibiting the expansion of state-regulated sports betting beyond four states which already have it - Nevada, Delaware, Montana and Oregon. The plaintiffs insist that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1991 (PASPA) represents an unconstitutional restriction on ]states’ ability to determine what kinds of gambling activities they choose to regulate and tax within their own borders.

The DOJ, defendant in the case, counters that the law is fully constitutional - even though the DOJ claimed that the law was likely unconstitutional when it was first being drafted - and has entered motions requesting that the suit be thrown out of court, and alternately that the plaintiffs be barred from pursuing the case, alleging that none of them have the standing to challenge the law.

In this most recent skirmish, the DOJ objected to the submission of the results of the New Jersey vote, claiming it has no bearing on the suit. The DOJ also objected to the number and length of submission documents, and demanded the court throw them out.

Plaintiffs filed three separate sur-replies that exceed their requested page limit by more than 800%,” wrote attorney Peter D. Leary, of the DOJ civil division. "And not only do these briefs, when combined, total 25 pages, but each one of them exceeds three pages when just taken alone.”

Attorney Eric M. Bernstein, counsel to iMEGA, in a letter opposing the DOJ request, wrote to US District Court judge Garrett E. Brown Jr., “iMEGA first tried to obtain consent of the Defendants to supplement the record which was refused. Thereafter, the court directed that ‘each Plaintiff and Intervenor Plaintiff shall each respectively file their comprehensive sur-reply within seven (7) days…the Order clearly states that each Plaintiff was to file a sur-reply.

“Further, the Order states no limit on pages, but states that the sur-replies should be ‘comprehensive’. iMEGA submitted a four (4) page brief which focuses on the impact of SCR132 (the New Jersey sports betting vote) on the arguments of the Defendants. The request of (the DOJ) should therefore be denied.”

“The DOJ has bogged down this proceeding with motion after frivolous motion, to what end?” asked Joe Brennan Jr., iMEGA chairman. “I’m not an attorney, but I do have decent reading comprehension, and the court’s order on sur-replies asked each of the three plaintiffs to submit ‘comprehensive’ briefs, with no mention of page limits’. Does anyone really believe that 25 pages concerning a successful, democratically-held vote on the issue of sports betting to be overwhelming?”

The suit, filed in March 2009, is expected to go to trial, absent further pretrial motions, sometime this spring.

Links
AP: N.J. Legislature approves legalizing sports betting question on election ballot
iMEGA letter: Oppose DOJ motion - Sports betting suit
DOJ Motion to strike reply: Sports betting suit
Letter brief regarding adoption of NJ SCR132 on behalf of iMEGA
Brief of Sen. President Stephen M. Sweeney

Gambling News

Without Adelson, Las Vegas Sands Posts $299 Million Loss

Without Adelson, Las Vegas Sands Posts $299 Million Loss

Las Vegas Sands Corp. posted a fourth-quarter loss of $299 million, after reporting a profit in the same period a year earlier, as the casino and resort operator saw its business dry up due to the coronavirus pandemic.

What Are The Best Pay Per Heads to Use for the Super Bowl?

What Are The Best Pay Per Heads to Use for the Super Bowl?

Gambling911.com has long been the undisputed leader when it comes to covering the world of Pay Per Head firms in the sports gambling sector.  Only the best of these companies work with Gambling911 and each offers a unique benefit ahead of the upcoming Super Bowl. If you are unsatisfied with your current provider, each of these companies promises that it typically takes under an hour to switch one's entire player base over to their own platform.

Where Can I Bet the Super Bowl Online From Minnesota?

Where Can I Bet the Super Bowl Online From Minnesota?

BetUS (established in 1994) is one of a handful of sports betting sites accessible to those living in the great state of Minnesota to place bets on this year's Super Bowl.  

Where Can I Bet The Super Bowl Online From Michigan?

Where Can I Bet The Super Bowl Online From Michigan?

State-licensed Michigan online sportsbooks are now live just in time for taking bets on this year's Super Bowl, but remember that the apps trace all your activity and will be reported to the IRS once you meet a specified threshold.

Connecticut Lawmakers Considering Sports Wagering Once Again

Connecticut Lawmakers Considering Sports Wagering Once Again

Lawmakers were urged Tuesday to finally legalize sports betting and internet gambling after years of debate. 

Syndicate