Iowa Senate Votes to Allow Fantasy Sports

Submitted by Associated Press on

Written by :

Associated Press

Published on :

DES MOINES  (Associated Press) — The Senate has passed a bill that would allow a person in Iowa to win money in fantasy sports contests.

The Senate voted 32-16 to approve the bill Thursday. It now heads to the House, where lawmakers are considering a similar bill.

Current law allows people in Iowa to participate in fantasy sports contests, but they can't win prizes. This bill would allow winnings.

Fantasy sports contests typically let participants build teams online that compete against other user-generated teams.

A similar bill failed in the Senate last year. Democratic Sen. Jeff Danielson, chairman of the state government committee, says the bill would align with laws in over 40 other states.

Some lawmakers expressed concern about the out-of-state companies running fantasy sports contests and the amount of money they may collect.

 

Related Content

Illinois welcome sign

What Are the Restrictions Betting the Fighting Illini Online From Illinois?

The main restriction is you can't bet them at all with a regulated website. Now doesn't that suck!
Sports betting

Kentucky to Raise Gambling Age From 18 to 21, Ban College Player Prop Bets

HB 904 also aims to tighten regulation on sports betting, fantasy sports, and charitable gaming, including a ban on "prop bets" for Kentucky college athletes.
Underdog Sports

Underdog Sports Acquires Exchange as Means to Enter Lucrative Prediction Market Sector

The acquisition enables Underdog to offer its own federally-compliant prediction market exchange, giving customers even more ways to express their opinions on sports and beyond.
Prizepicks ad

Love it or Hate it, PrizePicks Social Media Post Has Triggered Many....While Going Viral

A regular user (the person sitting cross-legged on the couch) appears calm and meditating. Behind him stand three large NFL defensive players in uniform from different teams. What could possibly go wrong with the interpretation here?