..

Case Against Online Poker Sites Weak Says I. Nelson Rose

Written by:
C Costigan
Published on:
May/12/2011
Case Against Online Poker Sites

Noted gambling industry attorney I. Nelson Rose breaks down the case against three online poker rooms indicted on April 15:  PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker and UB.com. 

Nelson made his assertions last week on Casino City.com.  It’s a most interesting read. 

Gambling911.com will break down Rose’s points in an easy-to-read format.

The UIGEA is an enforcement tool that only applies to money taken in by the online poker room.  In other words, nobody is going to be charged with simple violation of the Unlawful Internet Gaming Enforcement Act (UIGEA). 

“It requires there be a violation of some other federal or state anti-gambling law,” Rose explains.

In this case, prosecutors charged the defendants with bank fraud and money laundering.

But here is an interesting irony.   Rose suggests that the defendants technically did not commit bank fraud being that such a charge requires there to be a victim.

“The bank fraud statute requires a scheme to either ‘defraud a financial institution’ or to obtain any money owned or held by the bank. The second one won’t work. Lower courts have said the law was designed to protect the integrity of the banking system. But, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that part of the statute means what it says: prosecutors have to show the victim lost money. Here, the banks were supposedly tricked into making millions of dollars. Talk about a victimless crime.”

He adds:  “So, the DoJ is left with having to show that banks were “defrauded.” Again, there will be an issue of what exactly did the banks lose?

“As of June 1, 2010, there are regulations the banks have to follow. But, almost all the events took place prior to that; and, the final regulations do not provide for fines.”

Rose also points to the repeated use of the word “fraud” in the indictments, suggesting that the usage is a means of making it appear to players that online gambling sites cannot be trusted.

The most damning piece of information contained within the indictment, most experts including Rose agree, stems from the allegations that the online poker companies paid off a small Utah bank to apply the gambling transactions. 

“The indictment sets forth facts that would seem to call for a count of bribery, if true. Some of the defendants paid a small Utah bank $10 million to buy 30% of the bank, so the bank would transact online poker payments that the bank was reluctant to do. An officer and part-owner allegedly asked for, and received, $20,000. The indictment is careful to call this payoff a ‘bonus’ rather than a bribe. The banker was charged with conspiracy and being part of the other activities constituting crimes. This avoids the question of who exactly was the victim, since it was the banker who solicited the payment. It also gets around the problem of whether a briber and bribee can also be charged with being coconspirators.”

In closing, Rose states that the seized monies in this case could belong to players, not the online poker rooms – at least a portion of it – and that the US Attorney’s office has no right holding onto it

None of those charged will stand trial, Rose predicts.  They will settle out of court, paying large sums of money and perhaps serving nominal jail sentences. 

- Christopher Costigan, Gambling911.com Publisher

Gambling News

Federal Judge Appeals Ruling That Scrapped Sports Betting in Florida

Federal Judge Appeals Ruling That Scrapped Sports Betting in Florida

Plus signature gatherers allegedly engaging in fraud.  One of the elections supervisor finds his own unauthorized signature submitted.

Arizona Wildcats vs. UCLA Bruins Free Picks - January 25, 2022

Arizona Wildcats vs. UCLA Bruins Free Picks - January 25, 2022

The Arizona Wildcats vs. UCLA Bruins game line was coming in at UCLA +2 in what will likely be one of the better matchups of the year.  The Wildcats have just one loss on the season, UCLA has two.  Arizona is 11-5-1 Against The Spread while the Bruins are an abysmal 6-8-1 ATS considering their Straight Up record.

Mississippi State Bulldogs vs. Kentucky Wildcats Free Picks - January 25, 2022

Mississippi State Bulldogs vs. Kentucky Wildcats Free Picks - January 25, 2022

There is a good game in College Basketball Tuesday night that the line might suggest will be less competitive.  It's between the 13-5 Mississippi State Bulldogs and 15-4 Kentucky Wildcats.  The line on the game is Kentucky -9.5.  Gambling911.com has a line of -9 to -9.5 as well, so this one is on the money.

Michigan State Spartans vs. Illinois Fighting Illini Betting Trends January 25

Michigan State Spartans vs. Illinois Fighting Illini Betting Trends January 25

If you are looking to place a bet (or bets) on Tuesday's Michigan State Spartans vs. Illinois Fighting Illini game, be sure to check out some great trends here.

Michigan State Spartans vs. Illinois Fighting Illini Free Picks January 25

Michigan State Spartans vs. Illinois Fighting Illini Free Picks January 25

The Michigan State Spartans vs. Illinois Fighting Illini game on Tuesday should have a line of Illinois -3.5.

Syndicate