Written by :
Published on :
Bart Crebolder has spent close to ten years working in the iGaming world, testing casinos the same way ordinary players do. He signs up, deposits his own money, checks the bonuses, and pays attention to how each part of the experience actually works. Because of this practical approach, a lot of players follow his reviews when they want clear, honest information instead of marketing promises.
In this interview, Bart talks about one topic he deals with almost every day: casino bonuses and the rules that come with them. He explains why some offers feel confusing, what players should watch for before claiming a deal, and how the industry could make bonuses easier to understand. His thoughts come from years of real testing and simple observations gathered along the way.

Q: From your experience testing casinos directly, what's the biggest gap between how bonuses are advertised and how they actually work once players claim them?
The biggest gap is usually how simple the bonus looks at first and how complex it becomes once you dig into the rules. A headline might show the match amount and the free spins, but the real conditions sit behind a link. When players finally open the terms, they find wagering, bet limits, excluded games, or short expiry times. The offer itself hasn’t changed, but the full picture wasn’t clear from the start.
Q: Many players feel overwhelmed by wagering requirements. In your view, what do casinos get wrong when presenting these conditions, and what would “fair” wagering look like?
A lot of casinos keep the wagering requirement tucked away in small print. It’s allowed, but it creates confusion. Fair wagering isn’t about lowering the numbers; it’s about showing them clearly from the start. If a bonus has 35x or 40x, just say it. Fair also means giving players enough time to meet the requirement and keeping the game contribution rules simple.
Q: You’ve reviewed hundreds of bonus systems. Are there certain red flags in a promotion’s terms that instantly tell you the offer isn’t worth taking?
Yes. Very high wagering is the first warning sign. Short expiry times are another. I’m also careful with bonuses that have very low max bets, long restricted-game lists, or unclear withdrawal rules. Over time, certain warning signs become easy to spot. I’ve pointed them out many times in my detailed casino reviews. When too many restrictions stack up, the bonus usually ends up being more limiting than useful.
Q: How much does game weighting impact the real value of a bonus, and do you think most players understand how it affects their chances of clearing wagering?
Game weighting plays a huge role. Many players assume their favourite slots contribute fully, but that’s not always the case. If your go-to games only count for 20%, you’re working much harder to clear the wagering. Most players only notice this once they’ve already started using the bonus. A simple, visible chart would prevent most confusion, but not many casinos use one.
Q: Some casinos have shifted toward wager-free or low-wager bonuses. Do you see this as a genuine move toward transparency, or simply another marketing angle?
It really comes down to the casino. Some brands are honestly trying to make bonuses easier to understand, and you can see that in the way they present their offers. Others promote “no wagering,” but then limit the winnings or attach very low-value free spins. So the idea sounds good on paper, but the reality varies a lot. It’s still worth reading the details, because these offers aren’t all built the same.
Q: In your testing, which part of the bonus journey tends to cause the most friction — the claiming process, the gameplay restrictions, or the withdrawal stage?
The withdrawal stage, without a doubt. Claiming the bonus is usually easy, and players expect a few gameplay restrictions. The real frustration happens when players try to cash out. That’s when they run into pending periods, identity checks, or rules they didn’t notice earlier. A quick explanation during the claim process would prevent a lot of those issues.
Q: Players often blame casinos when they lose bonus funds. How much responsibility should fall on the casino to present terms clearly, and how much is on the player to read them?
It’s shared. Casinos should present the main rules clearly — wagering, expiry, max bet, and game limits. But players also need to spend a minute checking the basics before they start playing. When both sides meet halfway, there’s far less frustration later.
Q: Cashback, free spins, reloads, loyalty perks — casinos now offer dozens of promo types. From a player’s perspective, which of these tend to offer the best real value?
Cashback tends to be the most straightforward option. Players know exactly what they’re getting, and when the cashback doesn’t carry wagering, it’s even easier to use. Reload bonuses can work well too, but only when the terms stay on the lighter side. Free spins are hit or miss, because the value depends a lot on the game and the limits set by the casino. As for loyalty rewards, they’re usually more meaningful for people who play often. For most players, a simple cashback deal or a modest reload offer usually gives the most practical value.
Q: Looking ahead, do you think the industry is moving toward more transparent bonus structures, or will the gap between marketing language and reality continue to grow?
I do think things are slowly moving in the right direction. Players today pay more attention to terms, and that pressure pushes casinos to present bonuses more clearly. We’re already seeing more straightforward offers and shorter rules in some places. It’s not a perfect system, but the general trend leans toward cleaner, easier-to-read promotions. Over time, I expect more casinos to realise that clear terms help build trust, not harm it.
- B.E. Delmer, Gambling911.com