Foreign Observers Wary of 'Chaos,' 'Rancor' in US Debate: Latest State Odds

Written by:
Gilbert Horowitz
Published on:
Sep/30/2020

GENEVA (AP) — “Chaos, interruptions, personal attacks and insults,” one Chinese newspaper editor said of the U.S. presidential debate. An Australian counterpart said the debate was “swamped” by the “rancor engulfing America.” Denmark’s prime minister bemoaned the quarrelling and interruptions on display.

The first debate pitting Republican President Donald Trump against Democratic challenger Joe Biden was not a highlight of political oratory in the eyes of many overseas.

Yet interest ran high for its potential impact on what may be the most consequential U.S. election in years, now just over a month away.

Scroll Down For More...

ODDS TO WIN EACH ODDS

Courtesy of BetOnline Here (Claim Your Welcome Bonus - Max Bonus $1000)
To Win Alabama

Donald Trump  

-2500  

Joe Biden  

+1200  

To Win Alaska 

Donald Trump  

-900  

Joe Biden  

+600  

To Win Arizona 

Joe Biden  

-150  

Donald Trump  

+120  

To Win Arkansas 

Donald Trump  

-1400  

Joe Biden  

+700  

To Win California 

Joe Biden  

-2000  

Donald Trump  

+1000  

To Win Colorado 

Joe Biden  

-800  

Donald Trump  

+550  

To Win Connecticut 

Joe Biden  

-1800  

Donald Trump  

+900  

To Win Delaware 

Joe Biden  

-2000  

Donald Trump  

+1000  

To Win Florida 

Donald Trump  

-125  

Joe Biden  

-105  

To Win Georgia 

Donald Trump  

-240  

Joe Biden  

+190  

To Win Hawaii 

Joe Biden  

-2500  

Donald Trump  

+1200  

To Win Idaho 

Donald Trump  

-4000  

Joe Biden  

+1600  

To Win Illinois 

Joe Biden  

-2000  

Donald Trump  

+1000  

To Win Indiana 

Donald Trump  

-1400  

Joe Biden  

+700  

To Win Iowa 

Donald Trump  

-210  

Joe Biden  

+170  

To Win Kansas 

Donald Trump  

-2000  

Joe Biden  

+1000  

To Win Kentucky 

Donald Trump  

-2000  

Joe Biden  

+1000  

To Win Louisiana 

Donald Trump  

-2500  

Joe Biden  

+1200  

To Win Maine (Statewide) 

Joe Biden  

-650  

Donald Trump  

+450  

To Win Maryland 

Joe Biden  

-2000  

Donald Trump  

+1000  

To Win Massachusetts 

Joe Biden  

-2500  

Donald Trump  

+1200  

To Win Michigan 

Joe Biden  

-250  

Donald Trump  

+190  

To Win Minnesota 

Joe Biden  

-325  

Donald Trump  

+250  

To Win Mississippi 

Donald Trump  

-4000  

Joe Biden  

+1600  

To Win Missouri 

Donald Trump  

-1200  

Joe Biden  

+650  

To Win Montana 

Donald Trump  

-1600  

Joe Biden  

+800  

To Win Nebraska (Statewide) 

Donald Trump  

-2500  

Joe Biden  

+1200  

To Win Nevada 

Joe Biden  

-280  

Donald Trump  

+220  

To Win New Hampshire 

Joe Biden  

-220  

Donald Trump  

+180  

To Win New Jersey 

Joe Biden  

-1800  

Donald Trump  

+900  

To Win New Mexico 

Joe Biden  

-1000  

Donald Trump  

+600  

To Win New York 

Joe Biden  

-1600  

Donald Trump  

+800  

To Win North Carolina 

Donald Trump  

-140  

Joe Biden  

+110  

To Win North Dakota 

Donald Trump  

-4000  

Joe Biden  

+1600  

To Win Ohio 

Donald Trump  

-200  

Joe Biden  

+160  

To Win Oklahoma 

Donald Trump  

-4000  

Joe Biden  

+1600  

To Win Oregon 

Joe Biden  

-1200  

Donald Trump  

+650  

To Win Pennsylvania 

Joe Biden  

-165  

Donald Trump  

+135  

To Win Rhode Island 

Joe Biden  

-2500  

Donald Trump  

+1200  

To Win South Carolina 

Donald Trump  

-2000  

Joe Biden  

+1000  

To Win South Dakota 

Donald Trump  

-4000  

Joe Biden  

+1600  

To Win Tennessee 

Donald Trump  

-2500  

Joe Biden  

+1200  

To Win Texas 

Donald Trump  

-425  

Joe Biden  

+325  

To Win Utah 

Donald Trump  

-1000  

Joe Biden  

+600  

To Win Vermont 

Joe Biden  

-2500  

Donald Trump  

+1200  

To Win Virginia 

Joe Biden  

-1000  

Donald Trump  

+600  

To Win Washington 

Joe Biden  

-2000  

Donald Trump  

+1000  

To Win West Virginia 

Donald Trump  

-4000  

Joe Biden  

+1600  

To Win Wisconsin 

Joe Biden  

-180  

Donald Trump  

+150  

To Win Wyoming 

Donald Trump  

-5000  

Joe Biden  

+2000 

Place Your Bets Here

 

Observers from Asia and Australia to Europe and Africa looked for possible impact on financial markets and currencies, although the reaction was muted overall. Share prices slipped further in Japan and the dollar weakened against the Japanese yen and the euro, while U.S. futures were lower, auguring a weak opening on Wall Street. European bourses showed few initial tremors.

The debate itself went as expected, said Jeffrey Halley, a senior market analyst at Oanda.

“Markets have remained calm, as no policy surprises have emerged from the debate,” he said. “The debate will not move the needle on the Democrat lead in the national polls.”

The greater worry is over how tight the race might be and whether a delay in election results might prove disruptive, said Stephen Innes of AxiCorp.

“A highly polarized and possibly legally contested U.S. election is just around the corner,” Innes said. “With mail-in votes likely to be too high (and potentially questioned), there is a chance that we still will not know the result by Inauguration Day, with constitutional chaos ensuing.”

In Europe and Africa woke up to reports about the cacophonous showdown overnight.

“The comments I’ve seen from various European press is basically: ‘I’m happy I’m not an American voter this year.’ It’s just a mess,” said Jussi Hanhimaki, a Finnish-Swiss professor of International History at the Graduate Institute in Geneva.

“That’s all extremely disturbing for many Europeans, who generally would think the United States would be a symbol of democracy -- that’s been the oldest democracy in the world — that has this long, long tradition of, yes, very acrimonious debate, but there’s always been a winner and a peaceful transfer of power,” he said.

Quipped Kenyan commentator Patrick Gathara on Twitter: “This debate would be sheer comedy if it wasn’t such a pitiful and tragic advertisement for U.S. dysfunction.”

On Facebook, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen wrote, “An election debate in the States last night, where interruptions and quarrels were allowed to fill up way too much. Fortunately, this is not the case in Denmark. And I never hope it will be like that. The harsh words polarize and split.”

Walter Veltroni, a columnist for Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera and a former center-left mayor of Rome, said he had seen all the U.S. TV debates since Kennedy vs. Nixon in 1960, but “I have never witnessed a spectacle similar to the one last night.”

He said the debate showed how there are two Americas that appear irreconcilable.

“The impression is that of a country in stalemate, paralyzed by politics and tones that are foreign to its tradition,” Veltroni said.

Hu Xijin, editor of China’s nationalistic Communist Party tabloid Global Times, wrote in the paper’s microblog that the “chaos, interruptions, personal attacks and insults” on display were a reflection of America’s “overarching division, anxiety and the accelerating erosion of the system’s original advantages.”

“I used to admire this kind of televised debate in American politics, but I have much more mixed feelings when watch it again now,” wrote Hu, who personally and through his paper routinely attacks American policies.

The editor-at-large of The Australian newspaper, Paul Kelly, described the debate as a “spiteful, chaotic, abusive, often out-of-control brawling encounter with both candidates revealing their contempt for each other.”

“The rancor engulfing America swamped the first Trump-Biden debate,” Kelly wrote.

While Trump surely energized his base, he “never landed a political knock-out blow,” and Biden occasionally faltered but “showed he could fight,” he wrote, adding, “America faces a dangerous several weeks.”

A columnist for the newspaper, Peter Hoysted, called the debate a “shout-athon” and a “verbal shambles” that reflected American political life and the “yawning gap between the left and right.”

Tim Wilson, a lawmaker in Australia’s conservative government, was frustrated by the debate’s lack of policy focus.

“It was pretty unedifying in terms of a discussion, not just about the future of America, but ultimately because of the might of the United States, about the rest of the world as well,” Wilson told Australian Broadcasting Corp.

Amanda Wishworth, a lawmaker in Australia’s center-left Labor Party, said, “A lot of people would be scratching their heads, especially here from Australia, where, believe it or not, our politics is a little bit more gentle than the U.S. of A.”

Foreign policy issues were largely absent from the debate, although Trump slung accusations that China had paid Biden’s son Hunter for consulting work and Biden attacked Trump’s trade deals with China for failing to deliver benefits.

Trump also repeatedly blamed China for the coronavirus pandemic that has killed more than 1 million people globally and laid waste to economies around the world.

In the Mideast, the largely domestic debate drew raised eyebrows when Biden at one point said “inshallah” as Trump hedged on saying when he would release his tax returns. “Inshallah” in Arabic means “God willing.” It also can be used in a way to suggest something won’t ever happen.

Al-Arabiya, a Saudi-owned satellite channel based in Dubai, and The National, a state-linked newspaper in Abu Dhabi, both published articles noting Biden’s use of the word.

A Emirati political scientist, Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, wrote on Twitter that he saw the debate as a “tumultuous verbal battle.”

“How did America reach this level of political decline?” he wrote.

___

McGuirk reported from Sydney, Australia. Cara Anna in Johannesburg; Karl Ritter in Rome; Jan M. Olsen in Copenhagen, Denmark; and Jon Gambrell in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, contributed to this report.

Politics News

Syndicate