Play online poker with thousands of real people for FREE

You are here: Home / Party Gaming a No Show in US Court

Party Gaming a No Show in US Court

PartyGaming
Sep 13 2008 - 1:02pm

While unrelated to their plight in the US since UIEGA, Party Gaming (who owns Party Poker) has taken the extreme measure of refusing to show up for a court battle against a US-based slot machine manufacturer. In the case of WMS Gaming vs. Party Gaming the plaintiff has alleged that Party Gaming infringed on their trademarks by using the words "Jackpot Party" and "Super Jackpot Party" on their online slots site.

The case has now been overturned by the United States Court of Appeals after a July verdict awarded WMS $2.67 million in damages. Here's where the case takes an interesting turn. WMS originally asked for $27 million in damages but because they couldn't prove exactly what Party Gaming had earned from that specific game, the original judge reduced it to the $2.67 million figure. So now Party is on the hook for 10 times the original amount awarded. Why?

Party never showed up for court. One may assume that they're afraid to send any rep over for the company to the US due to fears of being detained and arrested for their pre-UIEGA activity here. Regardless of their reasons, they have boycotted the entire court proceeding and since the burden falls on the defense to provide proof of their income in this case, the judgment has now defaulted to the original amount.

They are negotiating with the US DOJ to reach a settlement but it's tough to imagine that they will get much sympathy given the hard stance the DOJ has taken on "illegal" online gambling operators that have US poker sites.

Source: AintLuck.com

Comments

PartyGaming a no show

Try $287 million, not $27 million. A little research never hurt anyone.

Poker News

  • Buying into EPT Berlin just got a whole lot easier! PokerStars and Spielbank Berlin has set up a deal with Hekticket - one of Germany's leading online ticket shops - so that players from all over the world can pay for their €5,300 main event buy-in online using their credit or by bank transfer.
  • The Poker Players Alliance (PPA), the leading poker grassroots advocacy group with more than one million members nationwide and over 120,000 members in California, today testified before the California Senate Governmental Organization Committee that not only is online poker able to be regulated, it is currently being effectively regulated across the globe. The Committee called the hearing to investigate licensing and regulating intrastate online poker.
  • Patrik Antonius
    We are just a few weeks into 2010 and Patrik Antonius is already among the year's biggest losers. In fact, he's the second biggest loser according to Poker Listings, with only Brian Townsend having a worse year thus far.
  • This past weekend saw the usual insane action at the nosebleed tables over on Full Tilt Poker. As all railbirds know, Full Tilt Poker is the place to go to see all kinds of crazy action. Nowhere else on the internet can someone sit down and watch hundreds of thousands of dollars change hands on the turn of a card.
  • Phil Ivey Super Bowl
    Reports were surfacing on Monday that poker pro Phil Ivey lost a whopping $2 million betting on Sunday’s Super Bowl between the Saints and Colts. Gambling911.com doesn’t expect to see Ivey celebrating Mardi Gras any time soon.
  • Jeff Madsen
    Jeff Madsen has won the 2010 Borgata Winter Poker Open and the well over half a million prize.
  • As legislators consider legalizing online games, the coalition says a new law could violate existing compacts.
  • Jason Ho
    Over the past several years, as online poker players have evolved from a sea of fish to a more overall competent player pool, players seek out to get whatever edge they can. Whereas in the past, players sought advice in books from successful players, the technological age has paved the way for virtual teaching methods from online coaches.

User login