GVC Plays Regulatory Roulette With Ladbrokes Bid

Written by:
C Costigan
Published on:
Dec/07/2017

LONDON (Reuters) - Bookmakers adjust the odds to make sure they can make money whatever happens. GVC’s 3.9 billion pound bid for Ladbrokes Coral Group is trying to do something similar, by using financial engineering to hedge the risk of a government clampdown on its target’s business.

The Foxy Bingo owner’s announcement on Thursday, the third time in a year it has been in talks with the bookmaker, was a surprise. Most analysts had expected GVC to wait until the outcome of a regulatory review of fixed-odds betting stakes, expected early next year, which could knock a fifth off of Ladbrokes’ operating profit, according to Investec.

Moving quickly makes sense. There’s strong logic behind a tie-up, which could create a group spanning traditional bookies, digital sports-betting and online bingo. Berenberg analysts reckon slashing costs could bring 160 million pounds of savings. Taxed at Ladbrokes’ 15 percent rate and capitalised, they’re worth 1.4 billion pounds, over half its undisturbed market capitalisation. The enlarged group would also be well-positioned to expand into the U.S. if the Supreme Court finds in favour of legalising sports betting.

The key to the deal is a funky contingent value right, which will pay out different sums depending on the outcome of the review, which is likely to set a cap on gamblers’ stakes. Using GVC’s Wednesday closing price and assuming the most benign outcome of the consultation, the deal values Ladbrokes’ equity at 3.9 billion pounds. If the government caps stakes at 2 pounds, likely to do serious damage to the business, the bid is worth 3.1 billion pounds. That range of outcomes roughly matches the potential hit to operating profit.

But GVC is still taking a risk. The contingent value rights are structured around seven discrete stake caps. But the measures might fall outside that range if the government tries other means of discouraging fixed-odds machines, like setting minimum time periods for games. GVC’s hedge might not cover the full extent of the damage. In that case, an as yet unidentified independent expert would get a say, but it could get messy. The benefits of moving quickly probably outweigh those risks, but GVC’s bid isn’t as perfectly hedged as it seems. initiative."

Gambling News

Customer Heaps Praise on AcePerPead.com Pay Per Head Sportsbook Site

I have been booking action for over a decade and have been using a pay per head sportsbook called AcePerHead.com for the last two football seasons.

The Death of The Bookie!

Are you ready for the future of gambling in America? If you’re wondering how you can prepare for the upcoming flood of competitors trying to steal your lunch, this is going to be the most important message you’ll ever read!

League Blocking of Sports Gambling Cost Racetrack $139 Million

League Blocking of Sports Gambling Cost Racetrack $139 Million

A New Jersey horse racing association has sued the four major pro sports leagues and the NCAA over what it says is more than $130 million in lost sports betting revenue.

5 Serious Questions To Ask Before Signing Up With A Pay Per Head Company

Don’t get ripped off with the wrong pay per head solution, finding a premium service will help online bookies achieve their sportsbook goals and become a master agent. Jot down these 5 serious questions and start searching for the best per head platform.

PricePerPlayer: 'Benefits of Legalized Sports Betting Far Outweigh the Negatives'

PricePerPlayer: 'Benefits of Legalized Sports Betting Far Outweigh the Negatives'

Pay Per Head businesses, bookies, agents and online sportsbooks were mostly celebrating last week's landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court allowing all 50 states to legalize sports betting (not all will).  The rationale for this mindset is, well, it changes the public's mindset about an activity that for centuries has been frowned upon, perhaps a few notches above prostitution.

Syndicate