Reply to comment

Epassporte charges the player 5$ per 100 to fund your acct. eWalletExpress charges the player 8.8% to fund their account. And I am sure they charge the poker rooms and casinos for their service also they don't do it for nothing and the rates PICClub is charging is typical for an ewallet service.. Think about this for a minute. The contract between PICClub and Merge is over one year old. Did Merge have a problem all this time? I guess not they seemed to promote PICClub as a preferred deposit method for a long time. This issue is really very simple so don't complicate it. Simple Issue here that you and many other distractors of PICClub seem to miss. Merge wouldn't even pay the 40K for their players cash outs. Thats players money not Merges not PICClubs and their shouldn't have been any issue to stop that money from being sent so PICClub could pay the players withdrawals. I seen many threads in forums beating up PICClub over late payouts when in fact it was Merge causing the lateness. Why are you so quick to slam PICClub or Chuck Kidd over fees when the Poker Room you defend basically blew off their players cashouts. Set all the fee stuff aside.. How can you justify the delay in sending the players money. PICClubs procedures on this are typical in this industry. Do you think Neteller or ewalletExpress send the players money before they get it from the poker room. Hey MERGE what about us players money?