Reply to comment

"Limbaugh's beliefs echo a very narrow segment of the American public." which, of course, explains why he has a daily listening audience of 20 million. 20 million. That fits your definition of "narrow"? But that's really not even the point is it? No, rather the point is that while it may be very, very, very true that nothing literally illegal was done in this, all of you who suggest that there is absolutely nothing at all wrong or improper here are willfully grossly overlooking one aspect: would you LIKE it to happen to you? Notice that I did not say, "would you accept it?" It is this line of thinking that led to the establishment of the First Amendment. The writers knew good and well that eventually (if not immediately) someone somewhere in America would have a problem with something they said or did (within legal boundaries) yet they had such an appreciation for true and real freedom that they willingly and readily added freedom of speech in there and to underscore its importance made it the very first amendment. I noticed in the replies here no one answered the question posed about Mr. Clooney... I suspect that the real reason behind that silence is "no, because that's not really the America we want." Ron Paul 2012!