You're going to disregard all that the poster had to say because of a typo?
The poster points out that Phil Ivey is the winningest cash player, the winningest online player and soon to be the winningest tournament player in the world ... and maybe of all time. This is undeniable evidence against the asinine assertion that he is overrated.
I'm not sure who is worse, the guy who calls the consensus (and as proven as possible in the game) best player in the world overrated, or the one who ignores a solid argument because of a fairly common typo. One's an envious a-hole and the other's a weasel. Tough call. Of course, the two post were probably written by the same envious-a-hole-weasel, so the call may be unnecessary.
Really?