Reply to comment

QUOTE"If you actually read the 2+2 thread, you can get your hand history through the website, but its by 1 hand at a time... either by hand number or by date query. Nothing hidden, you just can't download 100 hands at a time and if you wanted to make a record of 1000+ hands, it would be time consuming to go hand by hand and make notes. No hands or any real proof have been shown to back up the allegation. Read the latest pages in the thread and you will see the quote "great story with a boring ending". Don't believe everything you read on the internet or this tabloid site."ENDQUOTE ____________________________________________________________________________ If you had any sense, you will have understood the entire thread and the aims of the OP's. The original aims were to gain proof (OR disproof) by means of looking at the hand histories in a mass way in order to analyse them in bulk - (Because we all know that specific examples mean nothing on their own!). These orignal aims (Although have been clouded by new findings/accusations), are all backed up with appropriate links and sources The whole point of this is that PB have been dodging and avoiding at every opportunity so far to provide such examples that every other poker room would gladly give. PB's response is no where near enough to satisfy even the sceptics amongst us. As a poker player in the online world, wouldn't you like to know that things are being kept safe, and that any REASONABLE suspicion is allowed to be prooved or disprooven with the tiniest bit of help from the poker room itself...? ... If not then where about in PB do you work imho?