WTO
Internet Gambling
Decision Coming
Friday: Jon Kyl
Pleads for Continued
Policing of UIGEA
Gambling911.com has
been informed that a
World Trade
Organization
decision related to
compensation in an
online gambling
dispute between
Antigua and the
United States will
be announced this
coming Friday.
Our sources on
Capital Hill have
also revealed the
following letter
submitted by Senator
Jon Kyl, co-author
of the Unlawful
Internet Gambling
Enforcement Act,
made into law last
year and currently
being challenged by
iMEGA.org. Kyl
sent this out on
Tuesday.
----
INTERNET GAMBLING --
(Senate - December
18, 2007)
[Page: S15896]
GPO's PDF
--- Mr. KYL. Mr.
President, I would
like my colleagues
to be aware of an
important letter
signed by 45 State
attorneys general
expressing ``grave
concerns'' about
Representative
BARNEY FRANK's
Internet Gambling
Regulation
and Enforcement Act,
H.R. 2046.
The State
attorneys general
note that the
recently enacted
Unlawful
Internet Gambling
Enforcement Act of
2006 has
``effectively driven
many
illicit gambling
operators from the
American
marketplace.'' The
Frank bill
``proposes to do the
opposite, by
replacing state
regulations with a
federal
licensing program
that would permit
Internet gambling
companies to do
business with U.S.
customers.'' The
letter continues:
A federal license
would supersede any
state enforcement
action, because
5387 in H.R. 2046
would grant an
affirmative defense
against any
prosecution
or enforcement
action under any
Federal or State law
to any person who
possesses a valid
license and complies
with the
requirements of H.R.
2046.
This divestment of
state gambling
enforcement power is
sweeping and
unprecedented.
One final but
very important point
from the letter is
the impact of the
so-called
``opt-out''
provisions.
Specifically, the
letter reads:
[T]he opt-outs
may prove illusory.
They will likely be
challenged before
the World Trade
Organization. The
World Trade
Organization has
already shown
itself to be hostile
to U.S. restrictions
on Internet gambling
. If it
strikes down state
opt-outs as unduly
restrictive of
trade, the way will
be
open to the greatest
expansion of
legalized gambling
in American history
and
near total
preemption of State
laws restricting
Internet gambling .
The Frank bill is
unacceptable to the
State attorneys
general and it
ought to be
unacceptable to
Members of Congress
as well. I urge my
colleagues to oppose
the Frank bill or
any similar
proposals that would
create a permissive
Federal licensing
scheme for Internet
gambling .
I ask unanimous
consent to have
printed in the
Record the letter
from the
National Association
of Attorneys
General.
There being no
objection, the
material was ordered
to be printed in the
RECORD, as follows:
NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF
ATTORNEYS
GENERAL,
Washington, DC,
November 30, 2007.
Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker,
House of
Representatives.
Hon. HARRY REID,
Majority Leader,
U.S. Senate.
Hon. JOHN BOEHNER,
Minority Leader,
House of
Representatives.
Hon. MITCH
MCCONNELL,
Minority Leader,
U.S. Senate.
TO THE LEADERSHIP
OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES AND
SENATE:
We, the Attorneys
General of our
respective States,
have grave concerns
about H.R. 2046, the
``Internet Gambling
Regulation and
Enforcement Act of
2007.'' We believe
that the bill would
undermine States'
traditional powers
to make and enforce
their own gambling
laws.
On March 21,
2006, 49 NAAG
members wrote to the
leadership of
Congress:
``We encourage
the United States
Congress to help
combat the skirting
of
state gambling
regulations by
enacting legislation
which would address
Internet gambling ,
while at the same
time ensuring that
the authority to
set overall gambling
regulations and
policy remains where
it has
traditionally been
most effective: at
the state level.''
Congress
responded by
enacting the
Unlawful Internet
Gambling Enforcement
Act of 2006 (UIGEA),
which has
effectively driven
many illicit
gambling
operators from the
American
marketplace.
But now, less
than a year later,
H.R. 2046 proposes
to do the opposite,
by replacing state
regulations with a
federal licensing
program that would
permit Internet
gambling companies
to do business with
U.S. customers. The
Department of the
Treasury would alone
decide who would
receive federal
licenses and whether
the licensees were
complying with their
terms. This
would represent the
first time in
history that the
federal government
would
be responsible for
issuing gambling
licenses.
A federal license
would supersede any
state enforcement
action, because
§5387 in H.R. 2046
would grant an
affirmative defense
against any
prosecution or
enforcement action
under any Federal or
State law to any
person who possesses
a valid license and
complies with the
requirements of
H.R. 2046. This
divestment of state
gambling enforcement
power is sweeping
and unprecedented.
The bill would
legalize Internet
gambling in each
State, unless the
Governor clearly
specifies existing
state restrictions
barring Internet
gambling in whole or
in part. On that
basis, a State may
``opt out'' of
legalization for all
Internet gambling or
certain types of
gambling .
However, the opt-out
for types of
gambling does not
clearly preserve the
right of States to
place conditions on
legal types of
gambling . Thus, for
example, if the
State permits poker
in licensed card
rooms, but only
between
10 a.m. and
midnight, and the
amount wagered
cannot exceed $100
per day and
the participants
must be 21 or older,
the federal law
might nevertheless
allow 18-year-olds
in that State to
wager much larger
amounts on poker
around the clock.
Furthermore, the
opt-outs may prove
illusory. They will
likely be
challenged before
the World Trade
Organization. The
World Trade
Organization
has already shown
itself to be hostile
to U.S. restrictions
on Internet
gambling . If it
strikes down state
opt-outs as unduly
restrictive of
trade,
the way will be open
to the greatest
expansion of
legalized gambling
in
American history and
near total
preemption of State
laws restricting
Internet gambling .
H.R. 2046
effectively
nationalizes
America's gambling
laws on the
Internet ,
``harmonizing'' the
law for the benefit
of foreign gambling
operations that were
defying our laws for
years, at least
until UIGEA was
enacted. We
therefore oppose
this proposal, and
any other proposal
that
hinders the right of
States to prohibit
or regulate gambling
by their
residents.
Sincerely,
John Suthers,
Attorney General of
Colorado; Bill
McCollum, Attorney
General
of Florida; Douglas
Gansler, Attorney
General of Maryland;
Troy King,
Attorney General of
Alabama; Talis J.
Colberg, Attorney
General of Alaska;
Terry Goddard,
Attorney General of
Arizona; Dustin
McDaniel, Attorney
General of Arkansas;
Edmund G. Brown,
Jr., Attorney
General of
California;
Richard Blumenthal,
Attorney General of
Connecticut; Joseph
R. (Beau) Biden
III, Attorney
General of Delaware;
Linda Singer,
Attorney General of
District of
Columbia; Thurbert
E. Baker, Attorney
General of Georgia;
Alicia
G. Limtiaco,
Attorney General of
Guam; Mark J.
Bennett, Attorney
General of
Hawaii; Lawrence
Wasden, Attorney
General of Idaho;
Lisa Madigan,
Attorney
General of Illinois;
Stephen Carter,
Attorney General of
Indiana ; Paul
Morrison, Attorney
General of Kansas;
Charles C. Foti,
Jr., Attorney
General
of Louisiana; G.
Steven Rowe,
Attorney General of
Maine; Lori Swanson,
Attorney General of
Minnesota; Jim Hood,
Attorney General of
Mississippi;
Jeremiah W. (Jay)
Nixon, Attorney
General of Missouri;
Mike McGrath,
Attorney General of
Montana; Kelly A.
Ayotte, Attorney
General of New
Hampshire; Anne
Milgram, Attorney
General of New
Jersey; Gary King,
Attorney
General of New
Mexico; Roy Cooper,
Attorney General of
North Carolina;
Wayne
Stenehjem, Attorney
General of North
Dakota; Marc Dann,
Attorney General of
Ohio; W.A. Drew
Edmondson, Attorney
General of Oklahoma;
Hardy Myers,
Attorney General of
Oregon; Tom Corbett,
Attorney General of
Pennsylvania;
Patrick C. Lynch,
Attorney General of
Rhode Island; Henry
McMaster, Attorney
General of South
Carolina; Larry
Long, Attorney
General of South
Dakota;
Robert E. Cooper,
Jr., Attorney
General of
Tennessee; Greg
Abbott, Attorney
General of Texas;
Mark Shurtleff,
Attorney General of
Utah; William H.
Sorrell, Attorney
General of Vermont;
Robert McDonnell,
Attorney General of
Virginia; Rob
McKenna, Attorney
General of
Washington; Darrell
V. McGraw,
Jr., Attorney
General of West
Virginia; J.B. Van
Hollen, Attorney
General of
Wisconsin; Bruce A.
Salzburg, Attorney
General of Wyoming.
|