San Diego Chargers odds to win the 2007 Super Bowl

It's getting down to the wire and the San Diego Chargers are looking mighty impressive.  Heading into Week 12, the San Diego Chargers odds to win the 2007 Super Bowl were listed at 5 to 1 at VIP.com (see website here).  These are terrific odds that would pay out $500 for every $100 bet.

With Indianapolis and New England in the same conference, there is great value with the Chargers, but right now they are among the most competitive teams in the league, walking off with two impressive road wins over the last couple of weeks.

With an 8-2 record, the Chargers only losses came on the road against two powerful home teams: The Kansas City Chiefs and Baltimore Ravens.  And both those losses were by a mere field goal.

"The Chargers have been among the most consistent and fun teams to watch this season," commented Sports911.com Senior Sports Handicapper, Tyrone Black.  "Looking at the upcoming schedule, the Chargers can conceivably with all of their games."

A home matchup against a Broncos team that will looking for revenge and the potential to play in brutally cold weather up in Buffalo could cut into San Diego's record, but this is most certainly a team that should be participating in the post season, barring a complete meltdown. 

"The San Diego Chargers odds to win the 2007 Super Bowl are good and the payout even better," said Black.  "You can place a small future bet at VIP.com on the Chargers and walk off with some decent cash should they win the 2007 Super Bowl."

And the chances are good when one considers Indianapolis always seems to falter in the post season, San Diego has already beaten Denver and the New England Patriots are looking somewhat vulnerable.  Baltimore offers yet another obstacle but San Diego has already shown they can compete with the Ravens on the road.

San Diego Chargers odds to win the 2007 Super Bowl are likely to change over the coming days.  To get the best value, check out  VIP.com here now.

----

Don Shapiro, www.sports911.com

Originally published November 21, 2006 9:21 am ET