 Fox
News Excludes Ron
Paul from
Presidential Debate
After All
Fox
news eliminating debate
participation of
only
anti-war
Presidential
candidate:
Ron Paul
Breaking
News:
Fox News has
excluded Ron
Paul from
participating
in the last
debate the
weekend
before the
primary
election
begins. The
debated
occurs on
January 6,
less than
one day
after two
back to back
Republican
and
Democratic
debates are
being held
at the same
location
sponsored by
ABC News,
WMUR-TV and
Facebook.
Ron Paul
supporters
will be
holding
rallies,
writing
letters to
the editor,
boycotting
all
sponsors,
calling Fox
news and in
an
additional
move there
is even talk
of
contacting
all
shareholders
of the
company that
owns Fox
news (I will
let you look
that up
yourself)
and is
advising
everyone to
sell sell
sell and for
those of you
not able to
sell, buy
short. I am
not offering
any advice,
I am only
reporting
what I have
seen in
print.
Ron Paul
himself, a
man who
rarely gets
upset over
all of these
decisions to
oust him
from events,
stated "They
are scared
of me and
don't want
my message
to get out,
but it will," he
continued "They
are
propagandists
for this war
and I
challenge
them on the
notion that
they are
conservative."
As I have
been saying
for months,
the
mainstream
media is not
to be
trusted and
this is
further
proof of
it. This is
a
Presidential
election for
goodness
sake, not an
election for
scout
master. Fox News
is heavy
handedly
affecting
the outcome
of the
election of
the
President of
the Free
World. The
simple act
of excluding
Ron Paul
will have a
huge impact
on the
election.
New
Hampshire,
although it
has lost
half of its
delegates
due to
holding
their
primaries
too soon, is
still the
first
primary in
the nation
(Iowa holds
the first
caucus) and
thus has a
huge effect
on who
people will
determine is
an electable
candidate.
I have never
subscribed
to the "who
is most
popular"
method of
picking a
candidate, I
prefer to
choose based
on
substance,
but there
are many who
still
believe that
it is
wasting a
vote to vote
for the man
you want to
win if you
think he
could lose
and instead
choose a
lesser
candidate
with more of
a chance.
Nonsense.
All you get
by voting
for the
lesser of
two evils is
evil. You
do not get a
prize for
voting for
the man who
turned out
to be the
winner. If
you want the
war to end,
then Ron
Paul is the
only
Republican
who is
willing to
take that
stance and
the only man
who voted
against the
war in the
first
place. One
of the
reasons our
economy is
falling so
rapidly
along with
the dollar
is because
of our
government's
war
spending.
Those of you
that are
fine with
Fox news
choosing who
are viable
candidates,
sit back and
enjoy the
propaganda.
If there are
any folks
left with a
little
gumption,
Ron Paul's
staff is
planning a
rally that
will take
place at the
same time as
the 90
minute
(ummm,
debate?)
will air on
television.
The Fox
"debate"
will be
taped at
Saint Anselm
College in
Goffstown,
NH. It is
hard to call
it a debate
when they
have limited
participation
to only
candidates
who agree
about the
war and
nearly every
other
neo-con
un-conservative
position.
They cannot
even claim
that they
are doing
this by who
is doing
better in
the polls
because Ron
Paul is
polling
higher
than some of
those
invited.
Fox is
blatantly
attempting
to affect
the outcome
of this
political
election.
(Is that
legal under
FCC
rules?)
Of course
Fox news if
free to
eliminate
any
candidate
they want.
They are (or
should be) a
free market
enterprise
and Ron Paul
would
whole-heartedly
agree.
However,
that does
not mean
that the
market won't
respond.
How that
market will
respond,
well, I
guess we
will have to
wait and
see.
For me, I hope the market response is to tell Fox that their brand of propaganda (dishonestly described as news) isn't selling. ---- Revised December 30, 2007 7:13 pm EST Originally published December 30, 2007 12:10 pm EST
|