Here is what the fine folks from Pokerati had to say about this "plan":
"Ah, so really, it’s more that you have a plan to have a plan to have a plan. Ah, OK, thanks for clarifying. Long time no money see. Gotcha.
"Here’s what irks me about this situation — and it should irk everyone, not just poker players, or at least raise some eyebrows about the future of online commerce. Why do they need the actual/virtual money? When cops raid a drug den (or poker room), they confiscate the money because it is hard, concrete evidence. But in the Neteller case, there is no money, no cash, no physical nothing to actually seize. They’ve got all the records of transactions … so why can’t they let the cash go?
"I mean cash doesn’t really exist online … but it exists somewhere. Is this the sort of jurisdiction we want to give American authorities in cyberspace?"
In the meantime, one poster on the NETeller Coalition Board made an observation that we are actually surprised nobody else has.
An attorney with one of the largest law firms in the country looked
into this for me last week. He says there is no public record anywhere
of any money seized in connection to the case against Lawrence and
Lefebvre.
If anyone knew where the money was seized, they could file a lawsuit
there. But since no one knows where the money is and who has it, any
lawsuit would probably have to be filed against NETeller in the Isle
of Man, the last place your funds were officially located.
It is quite possible that $55 million was never seized by the US, and
that $55 million is the total amount NETeller owes to its US
customers. What else does NETeller have besides its US customers'
accounts as leverage for negotiations with the DOJ?
Navigant Consulting is a "forensic accounting firm" that deciphers
highly complex financial information, analyzes huge piles of data and
sifts through billions of dollars in transactions. NETeller and the US
Attorneys Office don't need Navigant Consulting to figure out basic
information like how much is owed and to whom.
It is assumed that NETeller is cooperating with the Department of
Justice investigation to the extent that they are disclosing all
financial details about their company and customers.
Any information Navigant Consulting collects will almost certainly be
shared with the US Department of Justice, and quite possibly other US
governmental agencies. It is doubtful that any legal action would
prevent the disclosure of account details.
Most lawyers will not accept this case based on "contingency" (the
possibility they could win X). This is a risky case involving a
criminal investigation, gambling proceeds and money laundering.
The costs of any legal services will have to be paid by the
plaintiffs. Each participant would be invoiced for their portion.
Failure to pay invoices could get you dropped from the suit.

NETeller 75 Day Promise of Payment Pleases Few